Back to Blog

How to Analyze Competitors Like a Strategist: A Step-by-Step Guide to Finding Their Weak Spots

Strategy & Competitor Research
N
Neo

Learn to analyze competitors like a strategist: identify rivals, map SEO and ads, spot content gaps, and turn weak spots into a winning plan.

If you’ve ever watched a competitor outrank you for “your” keywords, it can feel personal. But when you analyze competitors like a strategist, it stops being frustrating and starts being useful: their rankings, ads, pricing, and messaging become a map of what’s working—and where they’re exposed. The goal isn’t to copy; it’s to find their weak spots and build a plan that wins on search, conversion, and positioning. In this guide, I’ll show you a repeatable way to analyze competitors and turn the insights into actions.

16:9 photo-real scene of a strategist reviewing competitor positioning matrix on a glass wall with sticky notes labeled “pricing,” “SEO,” “messaging,” and “conversion”; alt text: analyze competitors strategy, competitive analysis framework, competitor positioning matrix


What “analyze competitors” actually means (and what it doesn’t)

To analyze competitors is to systematically compare how rivals acquire demand (SEO, ads, referrals), convert demand (landing pages, offers, funnels), and retain customers (product, pricing, support, community). It’s a business discipline, not just an SEO task, and it should end in prioritized decisions.

What it is not:

  • A one-time spreadsheet you never revisit
  • A list of “competitors” based on vibes
  • A copying exercise that dilutes your brand

I’ve seen teams waste weeks “researching” without choosing a hypothesis. The fastest way to get value is to decide upfront which lever you’re trying to improve: rankings, conversion rate, pricing, or positioning.


Step 1: Identify the right competitors (direct, indirect, and SERP competitors)

Most companies pick the wrong set first, and every conclusion after that is shaky. Use three buckets:

  1. Direct competitors: same customer, same job-to-be-done, similar price band
  2. Indirect competitors: different solution, same customer outcome (e.g., agency vs platform)
  3. SERP competitors: domains that consistently rank for your target queries (even if their product differs)

Output of Step 1: a clean list of 5–10 competitors, labeled by type, plus the 20–50 keywords where you collide in SERPs.


Step 2: Create a competitor “profile card” (so you stop guessing)

Before you dive into keywords, capture the basics so insights have context. For each competitor, document:

  • Who they sell to (ICP, industries, use cases)
  • Core offer (what they promise, not just features)
  • Business model (freemium, trial, demo-led, usage-based)
  • Primary acquisition channels (SEO, paid, partnerships, community)
  • Positioning angle (speed, trust, cost, depth, enterprise, niche)

This takes 30–45 minutes per competitor and saves days later. In my own audits, I often find a “mystery competitor” ranking well simply because they target a narrower persona with cleaner messaging—not because they have better SEO.

CompetitorCompetitor Type (Direct/Indirect/SERP)Primary ICPCore Offer/PositioningTop Acquisition ChannelTop 3 Landing PagesNotable Weak Spot
AsanaDirectSMB–Mid-market teams (Ops, Marketing, PMO)Work management platform for cross-functional executionPaid search/product; /pricing; /templatesComplex to administer at scale
Monday.comDirectSMB teams (Marketing, Sales Ops, PMs)Highly customizable “Work OS” with visual boards and automationsYouTube ads/; /pricing; /work-managementEasy to over-customize; governance can be messy
Trello (Atlassian)DirectIndividuals & small teamsSimple Kanban-based task trackingOrganic search/; /pricing; /templatesLimited reporting/workflows for complex projects
ClickUpDirectSMB–Mid-market (Product, Agencies, Ops)“All-in-one” productivity suite (tasks, docs, goals, chat)Influencer/affiliate/; /pricing; /featuresFeature bloat; performance complaints
NotionIndirectKnowledge workers, startupsAll-in-one workspace for docs, wikis, lightweight project trackingCommunity/UGC/product; /pricing; /templatesProject management depth requires heavy setup
AirtableIndirectOps, RevOps, PMs needing structured dataSpreadsheet-database hybrid with automations and app-buildingProduct-led SEO/product; /pricing; /solutionsPM workflows can feel “DIY” vs guided
“Best project management software” SERPSERPHigh-intent evaluators (SMB buyers)Review/listicle aggregators ranking tools and capturing comparison intentSEO (affiliate)/best-project-management-software; /asana-vs-monday; /project-management-reviewsThin advice; biased toward sponsored placements

Step 3: Analyze competitors’ keywords (but focus on intent, not volume)

Keyword lists are easy to pull and easy to misuse. A strategist looks for intent clusters and coverage gaps:

  • Problem-aware: “how to analyze competitors,” “competitive analysis framework”
  • Solution-aware: “competitor analysis tools,” “SEO competitor analysis”
  • Product-aware: “Semrush vs SpyFu,” “best competitor analysis software”

When you analyze competitors’ keywords, prioritize:

  • Keywords where they rank but your site is absent
  • Keywords where they rank with thin pages (weak spot)
  • Keywords where the SERP favors guides, templates, or tools and they don’t offer the right format

Quick heuristics I use:

  • If a competitor ranks with a short page on a complex query, it’s often a content depth gap.
  • If they rank with a dated year title, it’s often a freshness gap.
  • If their page matches the query but has weak internal linking, it’s often a topical authority gap.

Step 4: Reverse-engineer their content strategy (what they publish and why it wins)

To analyze competitors’ content, look beyond “they blog a lot.” You want patterns:

  • Content types: guides, templates, tools, comparisons, case studies, glossaries
  • Information architecture: hub-and-spoke, category clusters, internal link structure
  • SERP fit: do they satisfy the query with the right format (checklists vs essays)?
  • E-E-A-T signals: author bios, cited sources, first-hand experience, unique data

In practice, I’ve found the biggest “weak spots” are often not technical SEO—they’re missing middle-of-funnel assets (templates, calculators, teardown posts) that earn links and convert.

If you’re scaling content, this is where GroMach fits naturally: you can use competitor-driven keyword clustering and content gap discovery to generate a prioritized roadmap, then publish consistently with an E-E-A-T-aware workflow.

gromach calendar


Step 5: Audit their conversion path (where traffic turns into revenue—or leaks)

Rankings are only half the story. A strong competitor analysis includes how they monetize attention:

  • CTA strategy: demo vs trial vs newsletter vs template download
  • Lead magnets: checklists, reports, calculators, benchmarks
  • Landing page clarity: who it’s for, what it does, proof, friction
  • Trust assets: testimonials, case studies, security pages, comparison pages

Look for leaks you can exploit:

  • Long pages with no clear next step
  • “Features” pages without use cases
  • Demos that require too much info too early

When I tested this on a SaaS site, the competitor outranked us—but their top pages had weak CTAs. We built “next-step” content (templates + comparison pages) and captured more qualified leads even before we beat them in rankings.


Step 6: Analyze competitors’ pricing and packaging (for positioning weak spots)

Pricing pages are positioning pages. Study:

  • Plan structure: limits, usage tiers, team seats, add-ons
  • Value metrics: per seat, per keyword, per article, per domain
  • Anchoring: “most popular,” annual discounts, enterprise gating
  • Objections handled: ROI calculator, FAQs, guarantees, proof

For deeper pricing strategy thinking, see Simon-Kucher’s perspective on advanced strategies for effective competitive analysis. You’re looking for:

  • Underserved segments (e.g., “teams under 5,” “multi-site ecommerce”)
  • Confusing packaging (customers can’t self-select)
  • Missing proof (claims without outcomes)

Step 7: Turn insights into an attack plan (prioritize by impact and speed)

You’re done analyzing competitors when you can make decisions. Convert findings into a 30/60/90-day plan:

30 days (quick wins)

  • Refresh pages where you’re rank 11–20 with better intent match
  • Build internal links from high-authority pages to priority clusters
  • Add comparison pages where buyers are researching alternatives

60 days (compounding assets)

  • Publish hub pages + 6–12 supporting articles per cluster
  • Create one “linkable” asset (template, benchmark, calculator)
  • Improve conversion paths on top 10 traffic pages

90 days (moat-building)

  • Add original data, case studies, and expert quotes
  • Expand into adjacent clusters competitors ignore
  • Automate content operations (brief → draft → publish → track)

If you want the workflow to be scalable, GroMach’s approach—keyword clustering, competitor gap mining, bulk generation, and automated publishing—maps cleanly to this execution model.


Common mistakes when you analyze competitors (and how to fix them)

  • Mistake: Tracking too many metrics
    • Fix: Tie every metric to one outcome (rankings, pipeline, or retention)
  • Mistake: Only looking at direct competitors
    • Fix: Include SERP competitors; Google doesn’t care who your “real” rivals are
  • Mistake: Copying their topics and structure
    • Fix: Match intent, then differentiate with better proof, fresher data, and clearer UX
  • Mistake: Treating it as a one-off project
    • Fix: Set a monthly cadence and alerting for major changes (rank shifts, new pages, pricing changes)

Conclusion: Make competitor analysis a habit, not a panic move

Competitors will keep shipping pages, offers, and campaigns. The difference is whether you analyze competitors calmly and continuously—or only when rankings drop. When you treat competitor analysis like a strategist, their strengths become benchmarks and their weak spots become your roadmap. If you want, share your industry and top 3 rivals in the comments, and I’ll suggest the highest-leverage angles to target first.


FAQ: Analyze Competitors

1) How do I identify my real competitors for SEO?

Use SERP competitors: search your target keywords and list domains that rank consistently, then separate them into direct, indirect, and SERP-only competitors.

2) What’s the best way to analyze competitors’ keywords?

Group keywords by intent (problem/solution/product-aware), then focus on gaps where competitors rank and you don’t, or where their pages are thin and beatable.

3) How often should I do competitor analysis?

At minimum quarterly for strategy and monthly for monitoring. If you’re in a fast category (SaaS/ecommerce), monitor weekly for major moves.

4) Which pages should I analyze first on competitor websites?

Start with their top organic landing pages, pricing page, product pages, and any pages ranking for your priority keywords (especially templates and comparisons).

5) How can I find competitor weak spots quickly?

Look for: outdated content, weak E-E-A-T signals, unclear CTAs, missing mid-funnel assets, poor internal linking, and confusing packaging on pricing pages.

6) What tools help analyze competitors for SEO and ads?

SEO suites like SEMrush competitor website analysis tools and PPC/keyword overlap tools like SpyFu are common starting points, plus market context sources like the SBA market research guide.

7) How do I turn competitor research into a content plan?

Turn gaps into clusters, prioritize by business value and ranking difficulty, publish hub-and-spoke content, and track ranking and conversion impact over 30/60/90 days.